USLAW HOME

ABOUT USLAW

MEMBERS

EVENTS

PRACTICE GROUPS

 

STAFF & LEADERS

USLAW NETWORK, Inc.

Saturday, November 21, 2009 July 2004   VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2  
RETURN TO COVER PAGE

USLAW MEMBER NEWS

Click here for USLAW Member News!

IN THIS ISSUE...
The Importance of a National Law Firm Network
Cutting-Edge Approaches for Managing Mass Tort Litigation in the New Millenium
USLAW Transportation Practice Group Meeting to be Held in Boulder, Colorado, August 5-7, 2004
Department of Labor Modifies "White Collar" Exemption Rules
USLAW Member Firm to the Rescue
USLAW Member Spotlight
U.S. Supreme Court Permits Affirmative Defense for Constructive Discharge Cases
The "Galatis" Loophole
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Invalidates New Hours of Service Rule
The Big Apple Was a Big Success
Seventh Circuit Upholds Anti-Stacking Clauses
ACOG Research Results In Reevaluation Of Fetal Brain Injuries
Recent Trial Results of USLAW Member Firms
Hall Booth Avows the Only Thing Better Than Virginia Home Cooking is LeClair Ryan
Employers Score a Victory with the NLRB!
The Latest Weapon in the Arsenal of the Plaintiff's Bar: The Tort of Abuse Process
The Tripartite Relationship - Ethical and Practical Considerations
USLAW Construction Group Meets in Cleveland
Paid Family Leave Creates New Benefits For Employees and Increased Legal Concerns for California Employers
USLAW Member News
Are Medicare Set-asides Required in Cases Other than Workers’ Compensation?
The HIPAA Privacy Rule Contains Estate Planning Considerations
California Legislature Makes Confidentiality Provisions Difficult in Elder Abuse Cases
Same-Sex Marriages: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Ruling Enables Gay Couples to Marry
USLAW QUICK POLL

Often, one or more of the following states is depicted as the most "unfriendly" state for litigation for an out of state corporation. Which state do you believe is deserving of the label: "Tort Hell"?

Alabama

California

Florida

Mississippi

Texas

West Virginia

Other

 [See Results]

ABOUT USLAW

Launched in 2001, USLAW is an organization of independent law firms with offices throughout the United States. Through USLAW, these firms share information in order to enhance the speed, efficiency and quality of legal services provided to each member's clients. By sharing this information, USLAW firms provide high quality legal services, without unnecessary expense to the client.

Click here for more information about USLAW!

NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE
April 2004
February 23, 2004
Vol. 1 Issue 1
SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address in the box below to receive an email each time we post a new issue of our newsletter.


Add Remove
Send as HTML
 


ARTICLE SUBMISSION

USLAW welcomes aticles, case law, trial results and items of interest to be submitted for future e-newsletters.

Please e-mail
Roger M. Yaffe with submissions


The HIPAA Privacy Rule Contains Estate Planning Considerations
by Joseph Bonventre and Frederick Hoops, Clark Hill, PLC, Detroit, MI

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Public Law 104-191 of 1996 (“HIPAA”) Privacy Rule contains significant estate planning considerations that may result in amendments to existing estate plans.  The most notable concern is the impact on incapacity planning and the right to obtain information without going to court.
 
In a typical estate plan, a person will execute a Health Care Power of Attorney (“Health Care Proxy”) giving their spouse or other trusted family member the power to make health care decisions for them.   The person may also create a Revocable Living Trust which provides that upon incapacity, the person’s spouse or other third party is appointed successor trustee for purposes of administering the trust assets during incapacity.  A person may also execute a Power of Attorney for financial needs that becomes effective upon incapacity – the so-called “springing power of attorney.”
 
The goal of a well prepared estate plan is to avoid the involvement of the probate courts to the maximum extent.  Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, a “covered entity” may not be required to disclose protected health care information to the individual’s Health Care Proxy, successor Trustee or Attorney in Fact.  A “covered entity” may also not disclose this information to the individual’s spouse or other family members.   The term “covered entity” means a health plan, a health care clearinghouse and a health care provider who transmits any health care information in connection with a transaction covered by the privacy rule.  “Covered entity” also includes “business associates” of covered entities.  A “business associate” is a person or organization, other than a member of a covered entity’s workforce, that performs certain functions or activities on behalf of, or provides certain services to a covered entity, e.g., claims processing, data analysis, and billing.
 
The HIPAA Privacy Rule contains an exception that permits a covered entity to disclose protected health care information to a person authorized to act on behalf of the individual in making health care related decisions.  The HIPAA Privacy Rule calls this person the individual’s “personal representative.”  It is important not to confuse the term “personal representative” under the HIPAA Privacy Rule and the term “personal representative” of a decedent’s estate.  A “personal representative” of a decedent’s estate is the person who is appointed by the probate court to administer the decedent’s estate, while “personal representative” under the HIPAA Privacy Rule is the person who has authority to act on behalf of an individual in making decisions related to health care.
 
Essentially, there needs to be a separate authorization giving the person named as Health Care Proxy, successor Trustee or Attorney in Fact the authority to obtain protected health information (e.g., doctor’s notes, etc.) and to redisclose that information to the extent necessary and appropriate under the circumstances.  Unfortunately, simply including this authorization in a Health Care Proxy may not be sufficient.  In some states, a Health Care Proxy’s powers only become effective when the patient is unable to participate in medical treatment decisions.  As a result, the Health Care Proxy may not have the authority to exercise the HIPAA authorization to obtain the medical information.
 
If an individual does not specifically authorize a person to obtain and redisclose this information, the individual successor Trustee or Attorney In Fact may be forced to go to court to obtain this information, which essentially defeats the entire purpose behind planning for the individual’s incapacity.  
 
Most Revocable Living Trust Agreements include a provision that the settlor’s physician or physicians need to review and make a recommendation concerning the settlor’s mental and physical condition.  The term settlor is one of the many terms (e.g., creator, grantor, trustor, etc.) used for the person who creates a trust.  If the physician or physicians conclude that the settlor is incapacitated, then the trust becomes irrevocable and the successor Trustee nominated under the Trust Agreement is appointed successor Trustee during the period of incapacity.  This type of provision may be unworkable under HIPAA because the successor Trustee does not have the power to obtain medical information concerning incapacity.  Under HIPAA, the settlor’s mental and physical condition cannot be disclosed unless there is a separate authorization appointing a “personal representative” to obtain the information.  If the Settlor has not executed an authorization, then the only recourse for the successor Trustee is to commence a conservatorship proceeding in probate court to obtain the information. 
 
 If the so-called “springing power of attorney” is part of the estate plan, then the Attorney in Fact should also be appointed “personal representative” for purposes of the HIPAA Privacy Rule so that the Attorney in Fact can obtain this information.
 
It is also recommended that other legal documents be reviewed. For example, a partnership agreement may include a provision that upon incapacity of the general partner, a successor general partner is appointed.  A buy-sell agreement may provide that upon incapacity, the individual shareholder’s shares are repurchased. 
 
The bottom line is that all estate planning documents and other legal documents should be reviewed and, if appropriate,  revised to include the appointment of a “personal representative” for purposes of obtaining information under the HIPAA Privacy Rule.  The review may result in amendments to existing documents and/or the creation of a separate authorization appointing the Successor Trustee, Health Care Proxy and/or Attorney In Fact as “personal representative” under the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
 
Joseph A. Bonventre is an attorney in the Personal Legal Services Group of Clark Hill PLC.  He advises individuals on estate planning, probate, charitable planning and trust administration and related tax matters.  Mr. Bonventre is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel.  Mr. Bonventre can be reached at (313) 965-8293 or via e-mail at jbonventre@clarkhill.com.
 
Frederick H. Hoops, III is an attorney in the Personal Legal Services Group of Clark Hill PLC.  His experience includes all aspects of estate planning, tax minimization, asset protection, family partnerships, limited liability companies and the probate and non-probate administration of trusts, decedents’ estates, guardianships and conservatorships, and includes the preparation of estate and fiduciary tax returns for trusts and estates, and organizing and answering questions concerning charitable and other tax-exempt organizations.  Mr. Hoops can be reached at (313) 965-8323 or via e-mail at fhoops@clarkhill.com.
 
Clark Hill PLC (www.clarkhill.com) is a full-service law firm, with more than 120 attorneys, and offices in Detroit, Birmingham and Lansing, MI.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
LETTER TO EDITOR

Subject

Text

Your Name

City

State/Country

Your Email Address

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

POSTED LETTERS

No letters available.

[POST]
ARTICLES BY TOPIC
USLAW Member News
USLAW Events
Employment Law
Insurance/Bad Faith
Environmental / Toxic / Mass Tort
Professional Liability
Transportation
Recent Case Law/Legislation
Published by USLAW NETWORK, Inc.
Copyright © 2004 USLAW NETWORK, Inc.. All rights reserved.
TELL A FRIEND
Created with eNewsBuilder