Interstate 4 feels a little
shorter these days.
This asphalt ribbon once served
as a reminder of the many miles separating the Tampa Bay area and Metro Orlando.
Today, however, business and political leaders in both regions are looking at
the highway as a bridge between two growing communities.
"You've got two fine
public universities, more hotel rooms from Orlando to here than I think anywhere
else in the world, tourism, industry, sports teams,'' said Russ Sloan, president
of the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce. "We've got all the ingredients.''
You don't have to look hard
to see signs of cooperation between the Tampa Bay area and Metro Orlando. The
issue sits high on the agenda for economic development groups in both areas,
including the Tampa Bay Partnership, the umbrella organization for economic
groups here.
Leaders have begun to regularly
attend each other's meetings. Last year, the Orlando Regional Chamber of Commerce
held its annual retreat and planning program in St. Petersburg, introducing
its members to business people and politicians.
Welcome To 'Orlampa'? People
driving south from Orlando toward Lakeland may have seen the small sign developer
Kermit Weeks has posted on his property identifying the "Future Site of
Downtown Orlampa.''
It is not a sign of the
future.
Economic development leaders
say they don't want to merge the Tampa Bay area and Metro Orlando into one homogenous
metropolis. Nor do they want to create a new political entity encompassing Orlando,
Lakeland, Tampa, St. Petersburg and Clearwater.
The goal, they say, is to
improve regional cooperation and coordination between the two areas, drawing
on each region's economic identity to foster growth.
"Regional cooperation
has proved successful in other parts of the country," said Otis White,
president of Civic Strategies Inc., an Atlanta-based firm that advises cities
and regions on public policy issues.
For example, San Francisco
and San Jose worked together to solve transportation problems, creating a highly
mobile work force for the two areas that could take advantage of the technology
boom of the late 1990s, he said.
Washington, D.C., and Baltimore
also cooperate on a number of issues, he said, including transportation and
a recent Olympic bid.
The new spirit of cooperation
between the Tampa Bay area and Metro Orlando can be traced to two recent initiatives
- one, an ongoing success; the other, a well-funded failure.
The success story is the Florida
High-Tech Corridor Council Inc. The failure: the Florida 2012 Olympic effort.
The High-Tech Corridor was
born from one of the first major efforts to improve regional cooperation - saving
an important Orlando employer - said Randy Berridge, the council's president.
In 1995, AT&T Microelectronics
- now Agere Systems - was weighing two options for its Orlando-based semiconductor
production plant: expand the existing facility, at a cost of $700 million, or
build a facility in Spain and move operations there.
Expanding in Orlando would
mean 700 new jobs, Berridge said. A move to Madrid would cost some 1,000 jobs,
he said.
When it looked like AT&T
was leaning toward Spain, the presidents of the University of Central Florida
in Orlando and University of South Florida in Tampa banded together, committing
research money and resources, and sparking a two- region effort to convince
AT&T it should stay.
The effort worked.
"That was what made the
difference,'' Berridge said. "The company, quite frankly, did not have
that commitment or that level of expertise in Madrid.''
Agere recently announced it
would lay off some 200 workers in the Orlando area. That leaves the company
with about 800 employees there.
Keeping Agere led to the creation
of the Florida High-Tech Corridor Council Inc. in 1996.
"Everything with AT&T
was done on a reactive basis,'' Berridge said. UCF President "John Hitt
and [former USF President] Betty Castor's vision was that we function as a team
proactively.''
Government Aid
The newly formed council got
support and money from the Florida Legislature. Its mission: foster research
in high-technology industries, link economic development organizations from
across the corridor, and attract, retain and grow a high-tech work force.
In its first five years, the
council has pumped $25 million through the universities into 250 research and
development projects in the Tampa Bay area and Metro Orlando. That investment
spurred an additional $55 million in corporate and government grants.
"Think of the power when
you add all of this together,'' Berridge said.
The regional cooperation fostered
by the high-tech corridor is a boon for businesses.
Nancy P. Crews, president
of Custom Manufacturing & Engineering Inc. in St. Petersburg, said her company
teams up with USF and UCF for research and development.
Being in the corridor also
means her company can draw upon a trained work force, and is located near many
companies it does business, she said.
"I
think that [the corridor] is important from a number of different facets,''
Crews said. "It's a natural magnet for high-tech employees.''
Custom Manufacturing builds
instruments and monitoring devices for military and civilian vehicles. It recently
won a Small Business Administration award for developing a power management
system for military use that knows which devices to switch off, and which must
remain on, when there's not enough electricity to go around.
Honeywell Space Systems in
Clearwater also benefits from being part of the high-tech corridor, said senior
staff design engineer Kenneth Heffner.
"I don't think we can
just live in Pinellas County,'' he said. "We wouldn't want to work in a
vacuum, and if we did, it would cost us more to work in that vacuum.''
Olympic Effort
Florida's Olympic ambitions
didn't pan out, but planning for the 2012 summer games forced Tampa Bay and
Orlando area leaders to the table again. The issues for discussion: high-speed
rail, other transportation, hotel rooms, event planning, government coordination,
logistics and, of course, the myriad Olympic venues that would need to be built.
As a result, the relationship
between the two regions is more sophisticated and mature now than it would have
been if no one had attempted to bring the Olympics here, Sloan said.
"The 2012 effort opened
a lot of people's eyes to regional cooperation,'' he said. "It accelerated
- by a generation - breaking down those barriers.''
Leaders from the Tampa Bay
area and Metro Orlando are still trying to discover what each area has to offer
the other. They're often working with myths and preconceptions that aren't true:
Orlando has a Mickey Mouse economy. St. Petersburg is populated entirely by
retirees.
"We've got to start sharing
much more intensive data,'' said Don Upton, president of Tampa-based Fairfield
Index Inc., an economic development consulting firm.
"Here we are, sitting
side by side,'' Upton said, "but what we know about each other is no better
than what we'd know about Charlotte [N.C.] or Austin,'' Texas.
Upton interviewed business
leaders in both areas this year, and presented his findings at the Tampa Bay
Partnership's most recent leadership retreat. The consensus from both areas
is that people want to work toward more regional cooperation.
"After working on the
High-Tech Council and the 2012 Olympics bid," people said, "We finally
had a chance to interact with each other, and we liked what we saw. We would
like to be in the room more often,'' Upton said.
Reporter Dave Simanoff
can be reached at (813) 259-7762.