Wednesday, May 30, 2007 Issue 22   VOLUME 1 ISSUE 22  
In This Issue...
Why should we be Compliant?
“Is providing a privacy notice required by law?”
Three More States Consider Car Buyer's Bill of Rights Versions
Contact Us
Comments to the Editor
Subscribe Now!
Enter your email address and info in the box below to receive our newsletter:

Email Address:


First Name:

Last Name:

Company:

Add Remove
Send As HTML

Old pots of coffee ( past editions)
Issue 21
March 19, 2007
Vol. 1 Issue 21
Issue 20
January 25, 2007
Vol. 1 Issue 20
Issue 19
December 13, 2006
Vol. 1 Issue 19
Issue 18
October 27, 2006
Vol. 1 Issue 18
Issue 17
September 26, 2006
Vol. 1 Issue 17
Issue 16
August 21, 2006
Vol. 1 Issue 16
Issue 15
July 6, 2006
Vol. 1 Issue 15
Issue 14
May 8, 2006
Vol. 1 Issue 14
Issue 13
January 3, 2006
Vol. 1 Issue 13
Issue 11
November 6, 2005
Vol. 1 Issue 11

[MORE]
Dave's Corner
Three More States Consider Car Buyer's Bill of Rights Versions
http://www.autoremarketing.com/ar/news/story.html?...
by By Richard Greene, AR NewsMagazine Editor

DENVER — With the one-year enactment anniversary approaching for the California Car Buyer's Bill of Rights, attorney Rob Cohen now has Minnesota, Massachusetts and Illinois on his radar screen.

And it's Illinois that has Cohen most on edge, to the point of recommending that Illinois auto dealers gear up to contact their state legislators to defeat the Used Vehicle Buyer Protection Act that was introduced this past February.

[VIEW THE FULL STORY]
 

Featured Articles...
May 30, 2007
Why should we be Compliant?

Many dealers complain that obtaining compliance in a dealership is burdensome. Unfortunately, ignoring any aspect of required compliance programs can result in a single fine, or litigation costs, tha¬¬¬t will far exceed the annual cost of complying with privacy laws, OSHA, F&I and employment practices, to name a few. ACC believes training and compliance should not be viewed as burdens. With a dealership wide approach, training and compliance can promote customer satisfaction and bottom-line profits. Consumers will recognize the compliant dealership, understand more fully the value of products and merchandise being offered, and be more comfortable in making the purchases that benefit both them and your store.

[VIEW THE FULL STORY]
 
May 30, 2007
“Is providing a privacy notice required by law?”

Many dealers complain that obtaining compliance in a dealership is burdensome. Unfortunately, ignoring any aspect of required compliance programs can result in a single fine, or litigation costs, that will far exceed the annual cost of complying with privacy laws, OSHA, F&I and employment practices, to name a few. ACC believes training and compliance should not be viewed as burdens. With a dealership wide approach, training and compliance can promote customer satisfaction and bottom-line profits. Consumers will recognize the compliant dealership, understand more fully the value of products and merchandise being offered, and be more comfortable in making the purchases that benefit both them and your store.

[VIEW THE FULL STORY]
 
Published by Automotive Compliance Consultants, Inc.
Copyright © 2007 Automotive Compliance Consultants, Inc.. All rights reserved.
TELL A FRIEND
Created with eNewsBuilder